Appeal Decision 106 - Certificate of Lawful Development.
This appeal decision summary and
assessment has been produced by Planning Jungle Limited. For more information, please go to www.planningjungle.com/?p=20
|
March 2010 - Code a00106
Summary of Case (appeal
allowed):
The property is a
semi-detached house within a conservation area. The property has an original single-storey rear projection on
the side away from the adjoining semi number 5, such that the infill areas of the two semi-detached properties
are in the middle. The application was for a proposed single storey conservatory to the side of the original
single-storey rear projection, within this infill area.
The key issue was whether the proposed extension would be contrary to Class A, part A.2(b), which states that “In
the case of a dwellinghouse on article 1(5) land, development is not permitted by Class A if … the enlarged part of
the dwellinghouse would extend beyond a wall forming a side elevation of the original
dwellinghouse”.
The Inspector stated the
following:
“The dwellinghouse, which
is semi-detached, has an existing and original single storey rear extension which lines up with the existing and
original side wall to the house, and these together form the side elevation of the original dwellinghouse facing
the side elevation of No 7. The conservatory would be attached to the inner elevation of the rear extension, and
would run away from the boundary with No 7 across the rear of the house towards the boundary with No 5, the
other semi-detached part of the building. It would not project beyond the wall forming the side elevation of the
original dwellinghouse, as the whole of the rear extension would remain between the conservatory and the side
elevation.
The Council stated that
Class A does not specify which side elevation an extension should not extend beyond. However, it would not be
right to view the inward facing side elevation of the rear extension as the side elevation beyond which the
conservatory should not project, as that would restrict any extension to not exceeding the width of any original
rear extension, which would also imply its demolition.
It should be noted that
the GPDO in Class A.2(b) does not refer to an extension beyond the rear wall of a wall forming the side
elevation of the original dwellinghouse, but an extension beyond a wall forming the side elevation of the
original dwellinghouse. The extension which is not permitted in Class A.2(b) can only be an extension towards No
7, beyond the wall forming the side elevation, and not beyond the rear of the original rear extension to No 6.
I consider that the
conservatory would not therefore project beyond a wall forming a side elevation of the original dwellinghouse
and would be permitted development. The appeal succeeds.”
[Note: In my
opinion, the above conclusion is questionable, because it is based upon an interpretation of “a side elevation
of the original dwellinghouse” that is directly contrary to all five previous appeal decisions on
the subject].
Main
Conclusions:
·
The side wall of an original
rear projection (i.e. the side wall facing the infill area) is not “a side elevation of the original dwellinghouse” for the purposes of
the GPDO. [Note:
This would appear to contradict at least one other appeal decision – for further information see the entry in
the “Reference Section” on “A side elevation of the original dwellinghouse”]. [Relevant to: “A side elevation of the original
dwellinghouse”, A.1(d), A.1(h), A.2(b), A.3(b), B.2(c), C.2, E.3, G.1(b)].
·
For example, an extension to the
side of an original rear projection within a conservation area
(or other article 1(5) land) is permitted development. [Note: This would appear to contradict
at least one other appeal decision – for further information see the entry in the “Reference Section” on “A
side elevation of the original dwellinghouse”]. [Relevant to: “A side elevation of the original
dwellinghouse”, A.1(d), A.1(h), A.2(b), A.3(b), B.2(c), C.2, E.3, G.1(b)].
Links to the “Appeal
Decision Notice” and other associated documents (e.g. drawings, etc):
·
Appeal Decision
Notice:
http://planningjungle.com/?s2member_file_download=a00106-Appeal-Decision-Notice.pdf&s2member_skip_confirmation&s2member_file_inline=yes
·
Drawings: http://planningjungle.com/?s2member_file_download=a00106-Drawings.pdf&s2member_skip_confirmation&s2member_file_inline=yes
Download documents and diagrams of
useful
Permitted Development
information
|