Appeal Decision 79 - Certificate of Lawful Development.
    
        
            
                
                    This appeal decision summary and
                          assessment has been produced by Planning Jungle Limited.  For more information, please go to  www.planningjungle.com/?p=20
                 
             | 
         
    
 
 
 
 
 
January 2010 - Code a00079 
  
Summary of Case (appeal
   dismissed):  
  
The property is a two-storey
   semi-detached house, with an existing two-storey rear extension and single storey side extension. The
   application was for a proposed rear dormer, two front rooflights, first floor side window, and an alteration to
   a soil and vent pipe.  
  
The key issue was whether the
   use of felt for the flat roof of the proposed rear dormer would be contrary to Class B, part B.2(a), which
   requires that “the materials used in any exterior work shall be of a similar appearance to those used in the
   construction of the exterior of the existing dwellinghouse”.  
  
The appellant argued that the
   felt on the flat roof of the proposed rear dormer would be of a similar appearance to the felt on the existing
   single storey side extension. The Inspector examined whether the latter extension, which is a small lean-to
   structure used for storage, could be said to form part of the existing dwellinghouse. He concluded the
   following:  
  
“My conclusion is that the
   lean-to structure is part of the existing dwellinghouse. That being so the proposed roofing felt for the dormer
   would be of similar appearance”.  
  
[Note: The
   wording of the above conclusion implies that, for the felt on the flat roof of a dormer to comply with Class B,
   part B.2(a), it is necessary for there to be a material similar to felt on the existing house. This would appear
   to contradict the conclusions of other appeal decisions where Inspectors have argued that, due to the limited
   visibility of the flat roof of a dormer, this condition would be met even if there is not a material similar to
   felt on the existing house].  
  
Main
   Conclusions:  
  
·      
      The use of felt (or similar) for
      the flat roof of a dormer (assuming that the visibility of the roof would be limited) would not (in
      principle) be contrary to Class B, part B.2(a). However, the Inspector indicates (or implies) that the felt
      would need to have a similar colour to the materials on the existing house. [Note: This would appear to contradict
      at least one other appeal decision – for further information see the entry in the “Reference Section” on
      “Materials”] [Relevant to: “Materials”, A.3(a), B.2(a)]. 
  
Links to the “Appeal
   Decision Notice” and other associated documents (e.g. drawings, etc):  
  
·      
      Appeal Decision
      Notice: 
http://planningjungle.com/?s2member_file_download=a00079-Appeal-Decision-Notice.pdf&s2member_skip_confirmation&s2member_file_inline=yes  
  
  
  
 
   
  
Download documents and diagrams of
useful 
Permitted Development
information 
  
 
 |