| Appeal Decision 61 - Certificate of Lawful Development.
    
        
            | 
                    This appeal decision summary and
                          assessment has been produced by Planning Jungle Limited.  For more information, please go to  www.planningjungle.com/?p=20
                 |  
 
 
 
 December 2009 - Code a00061     Summary of Case (appeal
   allowed):    The property is a two-storey
   semi-detached house, with a hipped roof.  The application was for a
   proposed hip-to-gable roof extension and the erection of a rear roof dormer.    The key issue was whether the
   use of felt for the flat roof of the proposed rear dormer would be contrary to Class B, part B.2(a), which
   requires that “the materials used in any exterior work shall be of a similar appearance to those used in the
   construction of the exterior of the existing dwellinghouse”.    The Inspector stated the
   following:    “The condition requires
   that external materials used shall be of similar appearance to those of the exterior of the existing
   dwellinghouse. This does not require, therefore, that they have to be of the same type, or even that they match,
   rather it must mean that factors such as visibility and overall effect on the appearance of the house when the
   development has been undertaken are relevant”.  …  “As for the roof of the
   dormer, this would not be visible from any public viewpoint, and most probably in any private view, because of
   its height and its proximity to the ridge of the house. It follows that any material used on the dormer
   roof would not, in this case, have any appreciable impact on the external appearance of the property. I conclude
   that the materials that would be visible would be likely to be of a similar appearance to those used in the
   construction of the exterior of the existing dwelling”.    Main
   Conclusions:    
·      
      The use of felt (or similar) for
      the flat roof of a dormer (assuming that the visibility of the roof would be limited) would not be
      contrary to Class B, part B.2(a).  The Inspector indicates (or
      implies) that the felt would not need to have a similar colour to the materials on the existing
      house.[Note: This
      would appear to contradict at least one other appeal decision – for further information see the entry in the
      “Reference Section” on “Materials”]
 [Relevant to: “Materials”, A.3(a), B.2(a)].
   Links to the “Appeal
   Decision Notice” and other associated documents (e.g. drawings, etc):    
·      
      Appeal Decision
      Notice:http://planningjungle.com/?s2member_file_download=a00061-Appeal-Decision-Notice.pdf&s2member_skip_confirmation&s2member_file_inline=yes
       
      Download documents and diagrams of
useful Permitted Development
information 
 
   |