Appeal Decision 36 - Certificate of Lawful Development.
This appeal decision summary and
assessment has been produced by Planning Jungle Limited. For more information, please go to www.planningjungle.com/?p=20
|
October 2009 - Code a00036
Summary of Case (appeal
allowed):
The property is a two-storey
semi-detached house, and the application was for a proposed rear dormer and front rooflights.
The key issue was whether the
proposed rear dormer would be contrary to Class B, part B.2(a), which requires that “the materials used in any
exterior work shall be of a similar appearance to those used in the construction of the exterior of the existing
dwellinghouse”.
The submitted drawings stated
that the faces of the proposed rear dormer would be “vertical tile hanging” and “concrete roof tiles to clients
choice”, and that the roof of the proposed rear dormer would be “felt”.
With regards to the roof of
the proposed rear dormer, the Inspector acknowledged that felt is not similar in its appearance to concrete roof
tiles. However, he noted that the requirements of Class B, part B.2(a) concern the appearance of the
materials, in the sense of how they would appear when employed as part of an alteration or extension to the
roof. Noting that the dormer roof would not be seen from normal vantage points in the locality, the Inspector
concluded that the use of felt for the flat roof would not be contrary to this
condition.
With regards to the faces of
the proposed rear dormer, the Inspector noted that the appellants had confirmed in their appeal statement their
commitment to provide matching tiles to the existing roof tiles, and accepted that Class B, part B.2(a) could be
complied with.
Main
Conclusions:
·
The use of felt (or similar) for
the flat roof of a dormer (assuming that the visibility of the roof would be limited) would not be
contrary to Class B, part B.2(a). The Inspector indicates (or implies) that the felt would not need to
have a similar colour to the materials on the existing house. [Note: This would appear to contradict
at least one other appeal decision – for further information see the entry in the “Reference Section” on
“Materials”] [Relevant to: “Materials”, A.3(a), B.2(a)].
Links to the “Appeal
Decision Notice” and other associated documents (e.g. drawings, etc):
·
Appeal Decision
Notice:
http://planningjungle.com/?s2member_file_download=a00036-Appeal-Decision-Notice.pdf&s2member_skip_confirmation&s2member_file_inline=yes
·
Application Form and
Drawings: http://planningjungle.com/?s2member_file_download=a00036-Application-Form-and-Drawings.pdf&s2member_skip_confirmation&s2member_file_inline=yes
·
Council’s Decision
Notice: http://planningjungle.com/?s2member_file_download=a00036-Councils-Decision-Notice.pdf&s2member_skip_confirmation&s2member_file_inline=yes
Download documents and diagrams of
useful
Permitted Development
information
|