Appeal Decision 29 - Certificate of Lawful
Development.
This appeal decision summary and
assessment has been produced by Planning Jungle Limited. For more information, please go to www.planningjungle.com/?p=20
|
October 2009 - Code a00029
Summary of Case (appeal
allowed):
The property is a two-storey
end-of-terrace house, and the application was for a hip-to-gable roof extension and a rear
dormer. The four houses making up the terrace stand at a 45
degree angle to Alnwick Road to the south and Paston Crescent to the east.
The key issue was whether the proposed hip-to-gable extension would be contrary to Class B, part B.1(b), which
states that “development is not permitted by Class B if … any part of the dwellinghouse would, as a result of the
works, extend beyond the plane of any existing roof slope which forms the principal elevation of the dwellinghouse
and fronts a highway”. The Council argued that, for this property,
both the front roof slope and the side roof slope constitute a principal elevation.
The Inspector acknowledged the “DCLG - Informal Views from Communities and Local
Government” (Dec 2008, updated Jan 2009, superseded Aug 2010), which states that “in the
vast majority of cases” the principal elevation will be “the part of the house that fronts the highway and which
usually contains the main entrance”, but that in a minority of cases there will have to be an assessment of “what
constitutes the principal elevation”. The Inspector concluded that the
word “elevation” is singular, and that there can only be one principal elevation. He noted that, in this particular case, although the side elevation has a larger
surface area than the front elevation, the former is a largely blank expanse of wall, apart from one small window, whilst the latter contains a
projecting gable to roof level, the main windows, and the main entrance within the projecting
porch. He therefore concluded that, in this particular case, the
front elevation is the “principal” elevation, and allowed the appeal.
Main
Conclusions:
·
Only one elevation can constitute “the principal
elevation”. [Note:
This would appear to contradict at least one other appeal decision – for further information see the entry in
the “Reference Section” on “Principal Elevation”]. [Relevant to: “Principal Elevation”, A.1(d), B.1(b),
E.1(b), F.1, G.1(b)].
·
This appeal decision provides an
example of the types of factors that should be taken into consideration when determining which
elevation is “the principal elevation”. [Relevant to: “Principal Elevation”, A.1(d), B.1(b),
E.1(b), F.1, G.1(b)].
Links to the “Appeal
Decision Notice” and other associated documents (e.g. drawings, etc):
·
Appeal Decision
Notice:
http://planningjungle.com/?s2member_file_download=a00029-Appeal-Decision-Notice.pdf&s2member_skip_confirmation&s2member_file_inline=yes
·
Aerial Photo: http://planningjungle.com/?s2member_file_download=a00029-Aerial-Photo.pdf&s2member_skip_confirmation&s2member_file_inline=yes
Download documents and diagrams
of useful
Permitted Development
information
|