Appeal Decision 27 - Certificate of Lawful Development.
This appeal decision summary and
assessment has been produced by Planning Jungle Limited. For more information, please go to www.planningjungle.com/?p=20
|
September 2009
- Code a00027
Summary of Case (appeal
allowed):
The property is a
semi-detached house, and the application was for a hip-to-gable roof extension and a rear dormer. Both of these
semi-detached properties front Ashgrove Road, and on each property this elevation contains a large ground floor
bay window and a first floor window. The application site also fronts Beaumont Road, and this elevation contains
the main entrance and garage (on the adjoining semi-detached property the main entrance faces a driveway
separating it from another property).
The key issue is whether the proposed hip-to-gable extension would be contrary to Class B, part B.1(b), which
states that “development is not permitted by Class B if … any part of the dwellinghouse would, as a result of the
works, extend beyond the plane of any existing roof slope which forms the principal elevation of the dwellinghouse
and fronts a highway”.
The Inspector noted that both the Council and the appellant agreed that there can only be one “principal”
elevation, and he did not dispute this statement.
The Council argued that, for this property, the elevation fronting Beaumont Road constitutes the principal
elevation, and justified this decision on the basis of the “DCLG - Informal Views
from Communities and Local Government” (Dec 2008, updated Jan 2009, superseded Aug 2010),
which states that “in the vast majority of cases it would be perfectly clear what the principal elevation was i.e.
the part of the house that fronts the highway and which usually contains the main entrance”.
The Inspector disagreed with this
argument.
He stated that the two windows fronting Ashgrove Road are what would normally be expected to be found on a front elevation. He stated that, in his mind, any person viewing the property would conclude that the entrance was to “the side or flank” of the
house, and the elevation fronting Ashgrove Road was the front and main elevation of the house and pair of
semi-detached dwellings.
As a separate issue, the Inspector noted that Class B contains conditions B.2(a) [materials], B.2(b) [set-back from
eaves], and B.2(c) [side windows obscure glazed and non-opening]. He stated that a certificate of lawful
development can not be issued subject to conditions, and dismissed the appeal on the basis that the
submitted drawing did not show the side window to be obscure glazed and non-opening.
Main
Conclusions:
·
Only one elevation can constitute “the principal
elevation”. [Note:
This would appear to contradict at least one other appeal decision – for further information see the entry in
the “Reference Section” on “Principal Elevation”]. [Relevant to: “Principal Elevation”, A.1(d), B.1(b),
E.1(b), F.1, G.1(b)].
·
This appeal decision provides an
example of the types of factors that should be taken into consideration when determining which
elevation is “the principal elevation”. [Relevant to: “Principal Elevation”, A.1(d), B.1(b),
E.1(b), F.1, G.1(b)].
·
The principal elevation is
not necessarily the elevation that contains the main entrance. [Relevant to: “Principal Elevation”, A.1(d), B.1(b),
E.1(b), F.1, G.1(b)].
·
A certificate of lawful
development should be refused if the applicant has not demonstrated full compliance with all of the
conditions of the Class. [Note: This would appear to contradict
at least one other appeal decision – for further information see the entry in the “Reference Section” on
“Conditions”]. [Relevant to: “Conditions”, A.3(a), A.3(b), A.3(c),
B.2(a), B.2(b), B.2(c), C.2, F.1, H.2(a), H.2(b)].
·
For example, if new side windows
at an upper level are not shown as obscure glazed and non-opening, then the application should be
refused. [Note: This would appear to contradict
at least one other appeal decision – for further information see the entry in the “Reference Section” on
“Conditions”]. [Relevant to: “Conditions”, A.3(b), B.2(c),
C.2].
Links to the “Appeal
Decision Notice” and other associated documents (e.g. drawings, etc):
·
Appeal Decision
Notice:
http://planningjungle.com/?s2member_file_download=a00027-Appeal-Decision-Notice.pdf&s2member_skip_confirmation&s2member_file_inline=yes
·
Aerial Photo: http://planningjungle.com/?s2member_file_download=a00027-Aerial-Photo.pdf&s2member_skip_confirmation&s2member_file_inline=yes
Download documents and diagrams of
useful
Permitted Development
information
|