Appeal Decision 21 - Certificate of Lawful Development.
This appeal decision summary and
assessment has been produced by Planning Jungle Limited. For more information, please go to www.planningjungle.com/?p=20
|
August 2009 -
Code a00021
Summary of Case (appeal
dismissed):
The property is a two-storey
house, and the application was for a ground floor extension and a roof extension. The application was made prior
to 1 October 2008, amended plans were submitted after 1 October 2008, and the Council’s decision was based on an
assessment of the latter against the amended GPDO.
The Inspector disagreed with the above approach, and stated that her decision must be based on an assessment of the
plans that were originally submitted against the previous GPDO.
The Inspector noted that the application had been submitted for a ground floor extension and a roof extension as
one development. She stated that the proposal (as one development) would not fall within Class A because it
includes an alteration to a part of the roof of the dwellinghouse (i.e. the roof extension would not fall within
Class A), and none of the other Classes are applicable (i.e. presumably on the basis that the ground floor
extension would not fall within any of the other Classes)
[Note: In my opinion, the above conclusion is highly questionable, because it implies
that an application for works to a house can not be split into separate components and assessed against separate
Classes. For example, this would imply that an application for “a rear dormer and two front rooflights” would
always have to be refused, because “as one development” it would not fall entirely within Class B or entirely
within Class C. This would appear to be contrary to many years of standard practice by LPAs and other
Inspectors].
Main
Conclusions:
·
Where an application is made for
a ground floor extension and a roof extension (i.e. separate extensions, but submitted as part of one
application), then a certificate can not be issued because the roof extension would not fall within Class A,
and the ground floor extension would not fall within any other Class. [Note: In my opinion, the above
conclusion is questionable, because it would appear to be contrary to many years of standard practice by LPAs
and other Inspectors]. [Relevant
to: “General”].
Links to the “Appeal Decision
Notice” and other associated documents (e.g. drawings, etc):
· Appeal Decision
Notice:
http://planningjungle.com/?s2member_file_download=a00021-Appeal-Decision-Notice.pdf&s2member_skip_confirmation&s2member_file_inline=yes
· Existing Front and Rear
Elevations: http://planningjungle.com/?s2member_file_download=a00021-Existing-Front-and-Rear-Elevations.pdf&s2member_skip_confirmation&s2member_file_inline=yes
· Proposed Front and Rear
Elevations: http://planningjungle.com/?s2member_file_download=a00021-Proposed-Front-and-Rear-Elevations.pdf&s2member_skip_confirmation&s2member_file_inline=yes
· Existing Side
Elevation: http://planningjungle.com/?s2member_file_download=a00021-Existing-Side-Elevation.pdf&s2member_skip_confirmation&s2member_file_inline=yes
· Proposed Side
Elevation: http://planningjungle.com/?s2member_file_download=a00021-Proposed-Side-Elevation.pdf&s2member_skip_confirmation&s2member_file_inline=yes
Download documents and diagrams of
useful
Permitted Development
information
|