| Appeal Decision 18 - Certificate of Lawful Development.
    
        
            | 
                    This appeal decision summary and
                          assessment has been produced by Planning Jungle Limited.  For more information, please go to  www.planningjungle.com/?p=20
                 |  
 
 
 
 August 2009 -
   Code a00018   Summary of Case (appeal
   allowed):    The property is a two-storey
   detached house, on which 2x two-storey side extensions have previously been constructed, and the application was
   for a single storey rear extension. Part of this extension would have projected from the rear wall of the
   original house, and part of it would have projected from the rear wall of one of the side extensions. (Note: As
   the layout of the property is relatively unusual, please refer to the drawings for further information).
 The key issue was whether Class A, part A.1(e), which states that “development is not permitted by Class A if … the
enlarged part of the dwellinghouse would … extend beyond the rear wall of the original dwellinghouse by more than …
3 metres”, restricts the width of the extension to the width of the original rear wall.
 
 
 The Council’s reason for
   refusal included the following wording:
 “Notwithstanding that the enlarged part of this detached dwelling would be a single storey enlargement extending
beyond the rear wall of the existing dwelling by no more than 4 metres and not exceeding 4 metres in height, the
enlarged part of the dwelling would extend in part only beyond the rear wall of the original dwellinghouse. For
this reason the proposed development does not fall within the scope of Class A, Part 1 of The Town and Country
Planning (General Permitted Development) (Amendment) (No. 2) (England) Order 2008 and planning permission is
therefore required.”
 
 The Inspector disagreed with the Council. He noted that limitation A.1(e) does not require an extension to be
wholly from or, indeed, from the rear wall of the original dwellinghouse at all, only that it cannot extend
“beyond” the rear wall of the original dwellinghouse by more than 4m in the case of a detached house. He noted
that, in this case, no part of the enlarged dwellinghouse would project more than 4m beyond any part of the rear
wall of the original dwellinghouse; nor, indeed, more than 4m beyond the rear wall of the original dwellinghouse to
which it is attached – albeit attached in part.
   This appeal decision would
   therefore indicate that, where the original rear elevation of a property is flat, Class A, part A.1(e) does not
   in itself restrict the width of the extension to the width of the original rear wall.    [Note: In my
   opinion, the conclusion of this appeal should be compared with the conclusion of “September
   2009 - Code a00023”, which stated that where a property has an original rear projection, an extension to the
   rear of this is limited to the width of the original rear projection. In my opinion, the key difference between
   these two cases is that “August 2009 - Code a00018” dealt with a property with a flat rear
   elevation, whereas “September 2009 - Code a00023” dealt with a property with a stepped
   rear elevation. With a flat rear elevation, where an extension to the rear of this elevation exceeds the width
   of the latter, the excess part is not physically to the rear of any “rear wall of the original dwellinghouse”.
   However, with a stepped rear elevation, where an extension to the rear of the original rear projection exceeds
   the width of the latter, the excess part is physically to the rear of the rear-facing wall within the infill
   area, which Inspectors have found to be part of “the rear wall of the original dwellinghouse”].    Main
   Conclusions:    
·      
      Where the original rear
      elevation of a property is flat, Class A, part A.1(e) does not in itself restrict the width of the extension
      to the width of the original rear wall.[Relevant to: A.1(e), A.1(f)].
   Links to the “Appeal Decision
   Notice” and other associated documents (e.g. drawings, etc):    ·       Appeal Decision
   Notice:http://planningjungle.com/?s2member_file_download=a00018-Appeal-Decision-Notice.pdf&s2member_skip_confirmation&s2member_file_inline=yes
 ·       Existing
   Drawings:http://planningjungle.com/?s2member_file_download=a00018-Existing-Drawings.pdf&s2member_skip_confirmation&s2member_file_inline=yes
 ·       Proposed
   Drawings:http://planningjungle.com/?s2member_file_download=a00018-Proposed-Drawings.pdf&s2member_skip_confirmation&s2member_file_inline=yes
 ·       Diagram of Original
   Building:http://planningjungle.com/?s2member_file_download=a00018-Diagram-of-Original-Building.pdf&s2member_skip_confirmation&s2member_file_inline=yes
 ·       Council’s Delegated
   Report:http://planningjungle.com/?s2member_file_download=a00018-Councils-Delegated-Report.pdf&s2member_skip_confirmation&s2member_file_inline=yes
 ·       Council’s Decision
   Notice:http://planningjungle.com/?s2member_file_download=a00018-Councils-Decision-Notice.pdf&s2member_skip_confirmation&s2member_file_inline=yes
         Download documents and diagrams of
useful Permitted Development
information 
 
 |