Appeal Decision 108 - Certificate of Lawful Development.
This appeal decision summary and
assessment has been produced by Planning Jungle Limited. For more information, please go to www.planningjungle.com/?p=20
|
March 2010 - Code a00108
Summary of Case (appeal
dismissed):
The property is a two-storey
end-of-terrace house, and the application was for a proposed rear dormer. It appears that the applicant did not
specify what materials would be used for the roof and the sides of the proposed rear dormer.
The key issue was whether the
lack of specification of what materials would be used for the proposed rear dormer would be contrary to Class B,
part B.2(a), which requires that “the materials used in any exterior work shall be of a similar appearance to
those used in the construction of the exterior of the existing dwellinghouse”.
The Inspector stated the
following:
“All permitted development
rights are subject to limitations and conditions. Condition B.2(a) of Class B states that “the materials used in
any exterior work shall be of a similar appearance to those used in the construction of the exterior of the
existing dwellinghouse;”.
The condition does allow
for some local interpretation. For example, some local planning authorities might interpret it in such a way
that would mean that all flatroofed dormer extensions, which typically have a felt or a fibreglass roof, would
not be permitted development.
However, the condition
should not be taken to mean that the type of material used needs to be either the same or similar to the
existing building. It only requires the appearance to be similar. A dormer roof need not be
covered by concrete tile or slate. Even where a different material is used it is possible that the condition
could be met if, for example, a similar colour were to be used.
The appellant contends
that the Council is trying to exploit a technicality to prevent the building of a flat-roofed dormer, which it
does not favour.
I disagree. The appellant
has provided no information on the application form, the application plan or the appeal representations about
the type of materials that would be used for the sides or roof of the proposed dormer. He has not demonstrated
that they would be of a similar appearance to those used in the existing dwellinghouse. Consequently, there is
no evidence to show that there would be compliance with condition B.2(a) and that the proposal would be
permitted development.
The burden of proof has
not been discharged. For this reason, I conclude that the Council’s refusal to grant a certificate of lawful use
or development was well-founded and that the appeal should fail. I will exercise accordingly the powers
transferred to me in section 195(3) of the 1990 Act as amended.”
Main
Conclusions:
·
The use of felt (or similar) for
the flat roof of a dormer (assuming that the visibility of the roof would be limited) would not (in
principle) be contrary to Class B, part B.2(a). However, the Inspector indicates (or implies) that the felt
would need to have a similar colour to the materials on the existing house. [Note: This would appear to contradict
at least one other appeal decision – for further information see the entry in the “Reference Section” on
“Materials”] [Relevant to: “Materials”, A.3(a), B.2(a)].
·
A certificate of lawful
development should be refused if the applicant has not demonstrated full compliance with all of the
conditions of the Class. [Note: This would appear to contradict
at least one other appeal decision – for further information see the entry in the “Reference Section” on
“Conditions”]. [Relevant to: “Conditions”, A.3(a), A.3(b), A.3(c),
B.2(a), B.2(b), B.2(c), C.2, F.1, H.2(a), H.2(b)].
·
For example, if an applicant
does not specify what materials would be used for a proposed extension, then the application should be
refused. [Note: This would appear to contradict
at least one other appeal decision – for further information see the entry in the “Reference Section” on
“Conditions”]. [Relevant to: “Conditions”, A.3(a), A.3(b), A.3(c),
B.2(a), B.2(b), B.2(c), C.2, F.1, H.2(a), H.2(b)].
Links to the “Appeal
Decision Notice” and other associated documents (e.g. drawings, etc):
·
Appeal Decision
Notice:
http://planningjungle.com/?s2member_file_download=a00108-Appeal-Decision-Notice.pdf&s2member_skip_confirmation&s2member_file_inline=yes
·
Drawings: http://planningjungle.com/?s2member_file_download=a00108-Drawings.pdf&s2member_skip_confirmation&s2member_file_inline=yes
Download documents and diagrams of
useful
Permitted Development
information
|