Certificate of Lawful Development Appeal Decisions by category of
development.
The Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development)
Order 1995
Part 1 (as amended on 1 October 2008)
This appeal decision summary and
assessment has been produced by Planning Jungle Limited. For more information, please go to www.planningjungle.com/?p=20
|
Enlarged Part of The Dwelling House
·
·
The examples on page 26 and 27
of the “CLG - Permitted development for householders - Technical guidance” indicate that the phrase “the
enlarged part of the dwellinghouse” not only applies to the proposed extension, but also
includes any previous extension to which the proposed extension would be attached. This would have a number of implications, some of which would contradict
the conclusions of various appeal decisions. For example, if a
terrace property has an existing single storey rear extension covering part of the rear elevation to a depth
of 3.1m, then it would not be possible to attach any new single storey rear extension covering the remaining
part of the rear elevation (even if the depth of the latter part was 3m or less). Indeed, this would imply that where a property has any existing extension
that would not in itself be permitted development under the current legislation, then any new extension
attached to this existing extension would automatically fail to be permitted
development. [Note: This contradicts the entry two
below]. [Source: “DCLG -
Permitted development for householders - Technical guidance” (August
2010)].
·
This appeal decision states, or
implies, that the phrase “the enlarged part of the dwellinghouse” not only applies to the
proposed extension, but also includes any previous extension (i.e. non-original part of the
application site) to which the proposed extension would be attached. [Note: This contradicts the entry
below]. [Source: June 2010 - Code a00125].
·
This appeal decision states, or
implies, that the phrase “the enlarged part of the dwellinghouse” only applies to the proposed
extension, and does not include any previous extension (i.e. non-original part of the application
site) to which the proposed extension would be attached. [Note: This contradicts the entry above
and the entry two above]. [Source: October 2010 - Code a00146]. [Source: November 2010 - Code
a00157].
[Source: May 2011 - Code a00245].
·
A projecting canopy can
be classed as an “enlarged part of the dwellinghouse”.
This means that such a structure would be restricted by the various projection limits of Class A (e.g.
A.1(d), A.1(e), A.1(f), A.1(h), and A.2(b)) [Source: June 2011 - Code a00251].
Download documents and diagrams of
useful
Permitted Development
information
|