ask us a question on permitted development           Permitted Development England
How to build a home extension  without Planning Permission using your PD rights - Oct. 1st 2008



Home Page About Us FAQ Advertise on this site Disclaimer Privacy Contact Us Site Map

Summary of the latest Permitted Development changes - May 30th 2013. 


Many of these changes to the GPDO do seem to be unnecessarily complicated and contrived, particularly the so-called ‘light touch’ consultation regime for larger householder extensions, as hurriedly drawn up by Eric Pickles in order to secure the passage of the Growth & Infrastructure Act through parliament.

The temporary nature of the increased limits on the size of domestic and commercial extensions is worrying: if larger extensions will not result in inappropriately designed buildings, then why make them subject to a sunset clause, particularly when prior approval safeguards have been put in place?

Unlike temporary changes of use, the economic – as opposed to procedural - benefits of allowing larger PD extensions are not immediately obvious and we will all have to live with the visual environmental consequences of poorly designed buildings long after the 30th May 2016 sunset disappears over the horizon.

It remains open for individual LPAs to draw up and implement Article 4 Directions – which incidentally no longer require the Secretary of State’s approval – to negate the increased allowance for householder extensions and/or the office to residential change of use, as many threatened to do when the initial consultation documents were circulated last year.

This will particularly apply to the many LPAs that either unsuccessfully petitioned to be exempt from the office conversion provisions, or where vehement public opposition was expressed to the residential extension proposals, leading to the threatened revolt by MPs as the Growth & Infrastructure Bill went through its final reading in the House of Commons.

Planning Minister, Nick Boles, has publically stated that anyone who suggests further changes to the planning system during the life of this Parliament should be shot. Perhaps he was thinking of his Secretary of State, Eric Pickles, or Zac Goldsmith and his fellow householder extension rebels in the House of Commons.

Also, he may have forgotten that during 2013 his department will be promoting further amendments to the CIL Regulations; streamlining of the Appeal Regulations; consolidation of planning guidance following the publication of The Taylor Report; and the ongoing ‘Red-Tape Challenge’. Politicians inevitably work on short timescales – there must be an election on the horizon!
























































































 Latest permitted development changes PD May 2013 summary